Appeal No. 2006-1780
Application No. 10/292,076
35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, description requirement. Our
review of appellants’ specification finds no mention of the claim
recitation.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing and the reasons well-
stated by the examiner, the examiner’s decision rejecting the
appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CATHERINE TIMM )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK/hh
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007