Ex Parte Genkin et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                     
                          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                   

                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   

                                                __________                                                     

                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                   
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                __________                                                     

                          Ex parte MICHAEL B. GENKIN and MICHAEL STARKEY                                       
                                                __________                                                     

                                           Appeal No. 2006-1785                                                
                                        Application No. 10/768,827                                             
                                                __________                                                     

                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                     

             Before THOMAS, JERRY SMITH, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent                                
             Judges.                                                                                           

             JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    

             This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                   

             examiner’s rejection of claims 1-34.                                                              

             The disclosed invention pertains to a system and method for testing                               

             computer applications.                                                                            

                   Representative claim 26 is reproduced as follows:                                           

             26. A method of emulating a target computing system, comprising:                                  








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007