Ex Parte Bush - Page 2



                      Appeal No. 2006-1848                                                                                    
                      Application No. 10/352,360                                                                              


                                                    BACKGROUND                                                                
                             The appellant’s invention relates to a hauling trailer (100)                                     
                      including a front wall (110), a rear wall (112), and a side wall (114),                                 
                      extending upwardly from a floor (120).  A remaining open side runs                                      
                      along the length of the trailer.  A set of hinged, bi-fold doors (130,                                  
                      132, 134, 136) are used to close the open side.  The doors are cross-                                   
                      braced and covered with mesh and/or steel grating(s) and or canvas.                                     
                      Braces (160, 162, 164) are used along the upper edges of the panel of                                   
                      the doors to maintain the edges in straight alignment when the panels                                   
                      are closed.  In one embodiment, the doors are tri-fold doors.  In yet                                   
                      another embodiment, the floor of the trailer includes a central deeper                                  
                      portion.  Independent claims 6 and 11 are representative of the subject                                 
                      matter on appeal, and a copy of these claims can be found in the                                        
                      appendix to the appellant’s brief.                                                                      

                             The examiner relies upon the following as evidence of                                            
                      unpatentability:                                                                                        
                      Lutkenhouse (Lutkenhouse) 4,092,039  May 30, 1978                                                       
                      Elliott (Elliott)   4,856,843  Aug. 15, 1989                                                            
                      Carter et al. (Carter)  5,599,058  Feb. 4, 1997                                                         
                      Anderson (Anderson)  6,325,438  Dec. 4, 2001                                                            



                                                            - 2 -                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007