Appeal No. 2006-1871 Παγε 6 Application No. 10/245,442 Here, we determine that there is ample motivation in the combined teachings of the references for one of ordinary skill in the art to have modified the deposition process of Nguyen to include a cleaning process sequence as taught by Ameen with a reasonable expectation of success in achieving a process corresponding to appellants’ claimed process. See In re O'Farrell, 853 F.2d 894, 903-904, 7 USPQ2d 1673, 1681 (Fed. Cir. 1988). In this regard, the examiner maintains that one of ordinary skill in the art would have been led to clean the chemical vapor deposition reaction chamber of Nguyen by introducing a cleaning gas through the gas distribution plate (showerhead) to react with deposits within the chamber after substrate removal as taught by Ameen to be advantageous for system stability. This is because the cleaning gas removes accumulated reactants, reaction products and byproducts from the reactor surfaces. See page 4, penultimate line through page 5, line 9, and pages 8 and 9 of the answer together with the portions of the applied reference referred to in that portion of the answer. Such reactor cleaning allows for continued use of the deposition rector following the cleaning while avoiding contaminating substrates with reactor deposits that would otherwise have built up in the reactor and flaked off without thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007