Ex Parte 5671364 et al - Page 5




                Appeal No. 2006-1874                                                                                                
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,351                                                                                
                               identification of a person who will receive a debit, a person who                                    
                               will receive a credit, the amount of such debit in units of said                                     
                               commodity, the amount of such credit in units of said commodity,                                     
                               and the identity of the deposit site,                                                                
                                       posting said records of transactions to debit and credit the                                 
                               deposit account data files of said persons to update said data                                       
                               identifying a number of units of said commodity held for the                                         
                               account of each said person;                                                                         
                                       said method permitting persons to conduct financial                                          
                               transactions without reliance on national currencies in conducting                                   
                               said financial transactions whereby obligations, of a person                                         
                               receiving a said debit of said units of said commodity held at a                                     
                               deposit site, to another person receiving a said credit of said units                                
                               of said commodity held at a said deposit site, are extinguished                                      
                               upon posting of said records of transactions, thereby eliminating                                    
                               payment risk.                                                                                        
                                                            Discussion                                                              
                A. The rejection of claims 1-16 over Marks                                                                          
                       and the Gold Certificate for obviousness                                                                     
                       The patent owner argues independent claims 1, 9 and 13 as a group.  We will specifically                     
                discuss only claim 13.  As for the dependent claims, the patent owner separately argues only                        
                claims 6, 7 and 10, and only on the basis that those claims “specify a remote access means by                       
                which a system user can access the system and submit transactions” (Brief at p.16).                                 
                       An obviousness determination under 35 U.S.C. § 103 must be based on the underlying                           
                factual inquiries of (1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the differences between the                    
                claimed invention and the prior art; (3) the level of ordinary skill in the art; and (4) secondary                  
                considerations of nonobviousness.  Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17, 148 USPQ 459,                          
                467 (1966).  As explained below, the examiner incorrectly determined the differences between                        
                the patent owner’s claimed invention and Marks.  The rejection cannot be sustained.                                 

                                                                 5                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007