Ex Parte Taylor - Page 1



                     The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                        
                      written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       


                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                          AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                    
                                      Ex parte ALFRED A. TAYLOR                                                
                                               ____________                                                    
                                           Appeal No. 2006-1902                                                
                                         Application No. 10/317,848                                            
                                          Technology Center 3700                                               
                                               ____________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                      
                                               ____________                                                    
             Before BAHR, NAPPI and HORNER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
             HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                              


                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                   This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the examiner's                   
             final rejection of claims 1-7, 10 and 11.  Claims 8, 9, 12, and 13 have been                      
             objected to as being dependent from a rejected base claim.                                        
                   We reverse.                                                                                 








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007