Ex Parte Chamandy et al - Page 6




             the layer 24 when the layer 24 is tucked under the loop 25 to arguably form a slit spaced            
             from closed ends as required by claims 27-29 and 31.  The examiner relies on Kolton      for         
             a suggestion to adhesively attach the device 10 to the layer 24 of Frowein ‘087.  Even   if          
             Frowein ‘087 were so modified, this would not make up for the deficiency of Frowein                  
             ‘087 discussed above.                                                                                
                    The examiner’s rationale in rejecting claims 32-37 as being unpatentable over                 
             Frowein ‘087 in view of Frowein ‘514 and Humble is set forth on pages 9-12 of th      e              
             answer.  Specifically, the examiner contends that                                                    
                          it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to                       
                          provide Frowein 087's function strip (elongate housing) such                            
                          that the pocket is ''closed except for the slit'' (claim 32, claim                      
                          35) wherein the slit ''sized to receive the marker'' (claim 32) and                     
                          ''spaced from the closed ends'' (claim 32, claim 35) and to insert                      
                          the antitheft device ''through the wall'' (claim 36) and into the                       
                          pocket 22 since (1) Frowein 087 teaches    inserting an antitheft                       
                          device into a pocket (figure 3), (2) Frowein 514 suggests                               
                          locating an antitheft device in a pocket having all its edges                           
                          closed so that the antitheft device cannot fall out and (3)                             
                          Humble et al, which teaches an antitheft device located in a                            
                          pocket having all of its edges closed, suggests disposing the                           
                          antitheft device in the pocket of an elongate housing by                                
                          inserting the antitheft device through a slot (slit) in a wall of the                   
                          pocket.  Hence, Frowein 087, directed to theft detection,                               
                          teaches the combination of a label comprising fabric label                              
                          material, a detectable marker and a pocket in combination with                          
                          the detectable marker (alarm tripping device 10) being                                  
                          insertable through an opening of the label into the pocket 22.                          
                          Frowein 087's label has a pair of long edges extending between                          
                          the short edges 16, and is therefore elongated.  Each of the long                       
                          edges is closed as can be seen from the cross-sectional view of                         
                          figure 3.  Frowein 514 and Humble et al add to the disclosure of                        
                          Frowein 087 by motivating one of ordinary skill in the art to                           
                          close all four edges of Frowein 087's elongated tubular label so                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007