Ex Parte Lam et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                             
                    for publication and isnot binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                        ____________                                                         
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                       
                                        ____________                                                         
                      Ex parte FREDERICKA D. LAM and MICHAEL R. LAM                                          
                                        ____________                                                         
                                   Appeal No. 2006-1990                                                      
                                Application No. 10/678,231                                                   
                                  Technology Center 3722                                                     
                                        ____________                                                         
                                          ON BRIEF                                                           
                                        ____________                                                         
          Before FRANKFORT, OWENS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                   
          LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                 


                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                                       
          rejection of claims 1-18, 20, 21, 23-28, 30, 31 and 33-58, which                                   
          are all of the claims pending in this application.                                                 

                We REVERSE.                                                                                  


















Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007