Ex Parte Lam et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2006-1990                                             Παγε 2                            
          Application No. 10/678,231                                                                         

                                        BACKGROUND                                                           
                The appellant's invention relates to an artificial eye                                       
          (specification, page 1).  In particular, the lens for the eye                                      
          is made from a natural or synthetic material having a density                                      
          and hardness greater than glass.  One preferred material for the                                   
          lens is cubic zirconium, which has a MOS hardness of about 8.0                                     
          (specification, page 2).                                                                           
                Claim 1 is representative of the invention, and is                                           
          reproduced as follows:                                                                             
                An artificial eye comprising:                                                                
                a base; and                                                                                  
                a lens-lamina structure, attached to said base, comprising:                                  
                     a lens having a substantially flat backside, said lens                                  
                comprising a natural material selected from the group                                        
                consisting of diamond, sapphire, topaz, beryl, quartz,                                       
                zircon, and ruby; and                                                                        
                     a lamina attached to said backside of said lens.                                        
                The prior art references of record relied upon by the                                        
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                                                     
          Smith     3,480,971   Dec.   2, 1969                                                               
          Deeg et al. (Deeg)   4,079,470   Mar.  21, 1978                                                    
          Nasca     4,601,673   July  22, 1986                                                               
















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007