Ex Parte Lieder et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-2007                                                                                                                      
              Application No. 09/996,225                                                                                                                

                                                      BACKGROUND                                                                                        
                      Appellants’ invention relates to a circuit for detecting the polarity of a voltage                                                
              present across a set of telephone wires in both the on-hook and the off-hook states.  An                                                  
              understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary independent                                                     
              claim 1, which is reproduced below:                                                                                                       
                      1. A circuit for detecting a reversal in polarity, comprising:                                                                    
                      a differential amplifier;                                                                                                         
                      a low pass filter connected in series with the amplifier; and                                                                     
                      a Schmidt trigger connected in series with the low pass filter.                                                                   

              The Examiner relies on the following prior art references:                                                                                
              Albouy    4,540,853    Sep. 10, 1995                                                                                                      
              Hwang et al. (Hwang) 5,987,120    Nov. 16, 1999                                                                                           
              Bijman et al. (Bijman) 6,590,973     Jul. 8, 2003                                                                                         
                                                                          (filed Nov. 9, 2000)                                                          
                      Claims 1-6, 13, 17, 18, 20, 21 and 27-29 stand rejected                                                                           
              under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Hwang and                                                                             
              Albouy.                                                                                                                                   



                      Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                                                                        
              unpatentable over Hwang, Albouy and Bijman.                                                                                               

                                                              2                                                                                         















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007