Ex Parte Jandel et al - Page 1



                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                     
                               for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                              
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                 
                                                        ____________                                                               
                             Ex parte LOTHAR JANDEL, HANS-JOACHIM WEINTZ,                                                          
                                 JOACHIM WOLTERING, and GEOFFREY DODD                                                              
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                                      Appeal 2006-2047                                                             
                                                   Application 10/257,927                                                          
                                                  Technology Center 1700                                                           
                                                        ____________                                                               
                                               Decided: November 27, 2006                                                          
                                                        ____________                                                               

                   Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
                   WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                             

                                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                
                          This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to                                   
                   allow claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 16 as amended subsequent                                      
                   to the Final Rejection (see the Amendment dated Jul. 1, 2005, entered as per                                    
                   the Advisory Action dated Jul. 20, 2005).  These claims are the only claims                                     
                   pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C.                                        
                   § 134.                                                                                                          






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007