The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte LOTHAR JANDEL, HANS-JOACHIM WEINTZ, JOACHIM WOLTERING, and GEOFFREY DODD ____________ Appeal 2006-2047 Application 10/257,927 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: November 27, 2006 ____________ Before WALTZ, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1 through 3, 6, 7, 9, and 11 through 16 as amended subsequent to the Final Rejection (see the Amendment dated Jul. 1, 2005, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Jul. 20, 2005). These claims are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007