The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte KUMAR NAGARAJAN and ZAFER KUTLU __________ Appeal No. 2006-2051 Application No. 10/396,955 ___________ ON BRIEF ___________ Before RUGGIERO, SAADAT and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge. REMAND TO EXAMINER This is a remand of the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 17 through 21, in accordance with 37 CFR § 41.50(a)(1). After considering the record before us, we are convinced that the instant appeal is not ready for a meaningful review. Accordingly, we hereby remand the application to the Examiner to consider the following issues, and to take appropriate action.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007