Appeal No. 2006-2063 Application No. 10/126,019 Claims 8 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Brennan and Bullock. Claims 14 and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Litke. Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Burnell-Jones. Claim 23 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Bullock and Litke. Claims 28, 30 and 32 through 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Sondhi. Claim 29 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Sondhi and Brennan. Claims 37 through 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Randklev in view of Sondhi and Kaelble. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007