Ex Parte 5983207 et al - Page 12

                Appeal No. 2006-2083                                                                                                   
                Reexamination Control No. 90/006,352                                                                                   
                        Since the advent of modern electronics, financial systems implementing electronic cash,                        
                i.e., electronic representations of paper cash, have been known.  Ohta is one such example.  In                        
                light of Ohta and the silver certificate, one with ordinary skill in the art would have recognized                     
                the silver certificate as paper cash and would have been motivated to apply Ohta’s teachings on                        
                electronic cash to implement an electronic version of the silver certificate as electronic cash.                       
                That means one with ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to generate an                                 
                electronic representation of the silver certificate and to conduct associated processing and record                    
                keeping by means of a computer and a communication system like Ohta does with respect to                               
                ordinary paper cash.  As is stated by the examiner in the answer on page 10, line 23-24, the                           
                incentive or motivation would have been to provide rapid and efficient money transfer made                             
                possible by computers and electrical communications.  In that regard, the level of ordinary skill                      
                in the art is reflected by the prior art references cited by the examiner in support of the rejections                 
                on appeal as well as all the prior art references the patentee has provided to the USPTO and                           
                made of record in the underlying reexamination proceeding.                                                             
                        While motivation is necessary to combine teachings, the motivation need not be                                 
                expressly stated in any prior art reference.  In re Kahn, 441 F.3d 977, 989, 78 USPQ2d 1329,                           
                1338 (Fed. Cir. 2006).  One with ordinary skill in the art is presumed to have skills apart from                       
                what the prior art references explicitly say.  See In re Sovish, 769 F.2d 738, 743, 226 USPQ 771,                      
                774 (Fed. Cir. 1985).  There need only be an articulated reasoning with rational underpinnings to                      
                support a motivation to combine teachings.  In re Kahn, 441 F.3d at 988, 78 USPQ2d at 1337.                            
                The standard was clearly met in this case.  Ohta discloses an electronic cash system that                              
                implements an electronic version of ordinary paper cash.  The silver certificate is a paper                            
                instrument as good as and usable as ordinary cash.  One with ordinary skill in the art would                           



                                                                  12                                                                   


Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007