The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte LYNN HENRY SLAUGH, HOWARD LAM-HO FONG, and LAURENT ALAIN FENOUIL __________ Appeal 2006-2094 Application 10/339,797 Technology Center 1700 ___________ Decided: September 21, 2006 ___________ Before PAK, TIMM, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 35 to 51, all of the pending claims in the above-identified application. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007