Ex Parte Amalfitano et al - Page 1







                         The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                       
                          written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      
                                                                                                                 


                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                     

                                                 __________                                                       

                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                      
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                        
                                                 __________                                                       

                           Ex parte CARLO AMALFITANO and KEVIN L. FARLEY                                          
                                                 __________                                                       

                                            Appeal No. 2006-2195                                                  
                                         Application No. 09/773,255                                               
                                                 __________                                                       

                                                   ON BRIEF                                                       
                                                 __________                                                       

             Before JERRY SMITH, BLANKENSHIP, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent                                   
             Judges.                                                                                              

             JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                            



                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                     

             This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                      

             examiner’s rejection of claims 3, 4 and 8-17.                                                        

             The disclosed invention pertains to a method and system for queuing                                  

             far/far service requests in a wireless network.                                                      








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007