Ex Parte Romano - Page 1



                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                              
                             for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                    


                           UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                      __________                                                           
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                           
                                                      __________                                                           
                                       Ex parte CHARLES E. ROMANO, JR.                                                     
                                                      __________                                                           
                                                  Appeal 2006-2197                                                         
                                               Application 10/068,824                                                      
                                               Technology Center 1700                                                      
                                                     ___________                                                           
                                            Decided: September 21, 2006                                                    
                                                     ___________                                                           
              Before KIMLIN, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
              JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                               

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
                     Applicant appeals the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1, 3-22, and 38.                           
              Claims 23-36 stand withdrawn from consideration (Br. 1).  We have jurisdiction                               
              under 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                                                       
                     We AFFIRM                                                                                             









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007