Appeal No. 2006-2208
Application No. 10/782,265
Claims 1, 2, 5, 6 and 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over the combination of
Wasilewski, Isoe and Brodsky.
Claim 3 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Wasilewski, Isoe and Brodsky in combination
with Sampsell.
Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Wasilewski, Isoe and Brodsky in combination
with Chang.
Claims 7 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Wasilewski, Isoe and Brodsky in
combination with Encyclopedia Britannica Online article.
Claims 10 and 14-16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Thomsen and IBM-TDB.
Claim 11 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Thomsen, IBM-TDB and Patterson.
Claim 12 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Thomsen, IBM-TDB and Allport.
Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Thomsen, IBM-TDB and Encyclopedia Britannica
Online article.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007