Ex Parte Aleles et al - Page 21



             Appeal No. 2006-2248                                                                               
             Application No. 10/158,618                                                                         

                   North American Container involved a reissue patent, which had been held                      
             invalid by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.  The district               
             court bottomed its invalidity holding based on a violation of the recapture rule.                  
             During prosecution of an application for patent, an Examiner rejected the claims                   
             over a combination of two prior art references:  Dechenne and Jakobsen.  To                        
             overcome the rejection, North American Container limited its application claims                    
             by specifying that a shape of “inner walls” of a base of a container was “generally                
             convex.”  North American Container convinced the Examiner that the shape of the                    
             base, as amended, defined over “both the Dechenne patent, wherein the                              
             corresponding wall portions 3 are slightly concave ... and the Jakobsen patent,                    
             wherein the entire reentrant portion is clearly concave in its entirety.”  415 F.3d at             
             1340, 75 USPQ2d at 1549.  After a patent issued containing the amended claims,                     
             North American Container filed a reissue application seeking reissue claims in                     
             which (1) the language “inner wall portions are generally convex” was eliminated,                  
             but (2) the language “wherein the diameter of said re-entrant portion is in the range              
             of 5% to 30% of the overall diameter of said side wall” was added.  Thus, the                      
             claim sought be reissued was broader in some aspects and narrower in other                         
             aspects.                                                                                           
                                                     - 21 -                                                     




Page:  Previous  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007