Appeal No. 2006-2248 Application No. 10/158,618 matter surrendered in obtaining allowance of the claims which appear in the patent sought to be reissued. 49. The Examiner based the recapture rejection of claims 2-19 on the grounds that when faced in the original application with a rejection of original application claims 1-7 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over the Felty prior art patent, a rejection of original application claims 1-8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 over the Granger prior art patent, and a rejection of original application claim 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the Granger prior art patent, Applicants made two significant amendments: (1) First, Applicants presented new independent original application claim 11 which recites twenty-five (25) components of the claimed composition and a specific % w/w of each component with twenty-four (24) of the twenty-five (25) recited components being specific chemical compounds; new independent application claim 11 ultimately became patent claim 1. (2) Second, Applicants first limited by amendment and then canceled original application claims 1-10. - 14 -Page: Previous 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007