Appeal No. 2006-2280 Page 22 Application No. 10/244,011 col. 2, lines 20-23. Frazier further teaches that the tubular member (100) is at least partly constructed of a flexible material or the entire holder may be formed of the same flexible material. Frazier, col. 2, lines 23-27. Frazier teaches applying a contact surface (105, 305) to the tubular member (100) and that this contact surface must be of a high-friction texture which is preferably formed of rubber. Frazier, col. 3, lines 24-36. We note that rubber is a flexible and deformable material. Frazier does not teach an adhesive area on the ends of the tubular member for adhering the ends together. One having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention, possessed with the teaching of Frazier to use a tubular member around the shaft (longitudinal portion) of a cane having a high friction contact surface of rubber to prevent slippage, and possessed with the teachings of Carpenter to attach a strap around cane shaft to form a tube using a hook-and-loop fastener on the ends of the strap, would have been led to add a hook-and-loop attachment to the tubular member of Frazier in order to make the attachment of the tubular member to the cane stronger. See Dystar, 464 F.3d at 1368, 80 USPQ2d at 1651 (holding that when an improvement is technology independent, an implicit motivation to combine can be found based on a universal desire to enhance commercial opportunities when the combination results in a product or process that is more desirable, for example because it is stronger, cheaper, cleaner, faster, lighter, smaller, more durable, or more efficient.) C. Carpenter, Finegan and Shrader The examiner rejected claims 8, 9, 13 and 22 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Carpenter in view of Finegan and Shrader. The examiner determined that Carpenter and Finegan combined disclose all of the claimedPage: Previous 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007