The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TAKAO OZAKI
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2345
Application No. 10/366,458
____________
HEARD: NOVEMBER 15, 2006
____________
Before THOMAS, SAADAT, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from
the Examiner=s final rejection of claims 1, 2 and 4-6. Claim 3
has been canceled.
We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellant’s invention is directed to a visible/infrared
imaging camera capable of properly focusing infrared light images
even when the zoom ratio of the zoom lens system is changed.
According to Appellant, light transmitted through the zoom lens
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007