Ex Parte Schroeder et al - Page 5

               Appeal 2006-2400                                                                           
               Application 10/051,814                                                                     

               obviousness is what the combined teachings of the prior art references would               
               have suggested to those of ordinary skill in the art.  In re Young, 927 F.2d               
               588, 591, 18 USPQ2d 1089, 1091 (Fed. Cir. 1991); In re Keller, 642 F.2d                    
               413, 425, 208 USPQ 871, 881 (CCPA 1981).  In evaluating the prior art                      
               references for a suggestion, it is proper to take into account not only the                
               specific teachings of the references, but also the inferences which one skilled            
               in the art would reasonably be expected to draw therefrom.  In re Preda,                   
               401 F.2d 825, 826, 159 USPQ 342, 344 (CCPA 1968).                                          
                     Applying the above obviousness test to the present circumstance, we                  
               determine that the prior art references as a whole would have suggested the                
               claimed subject matter within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. §103.  As correctly                 
               found by the Examiner:                                                                     
                     Pregozen discloses a method for making a non-woven wet wipe                          
                     impregnated with an aqueous composition (See column 1, lines                         
                     10-12), in which a cationic biocide (claimed cationic functional                     
                     agent) is added to a preservative system to enhance the                              
                     antimicrobial effect of the combination of sorbic acid and citric                    
                     acid in the a preservative system (See column 2, lines 51-55).                       
                     The moistened wipe may be used for cleaning e.g. kitchen                             
                     counter tops, toilet bowls, sinks or delivering active ingredients                   
                     such as sunscreens, insect repellants to an animate or inanimate                     
                     surface (See column 5, lines 44-50). The moistened wipes are                         
                     made by applying the aqueous composition to a flexible                               
                     absorbent nonwoven substrate in an amount of about two to                            
                     five times the dry weight of the web an aqueous imbuement                            
                     carrying a polymeric cationic biocide having [a] molecular                           
                     weight of 1000-1400 (See column 3, lines 61-63) or monomeric                         
                     cationic biocide such as cetylpyridinium chloride (See column                        
                     7, lines 19, 27-35) at a concentration of about 0.03-0.24 %                          
                     weight (active basis) of the aqueous composition (which is less                      
                     than 6 milli-equivalents per liter) (See column 4, lines 10-13).                     
                     The nonwoven substrate employed in the moistened wipe is a                           

                                                    5                                                     


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007