Ex Parte Belik - Page 2


             Appeal No. 2006-2421                                                                                    
             Application 10/346,773                                                                                  

             disclosed therein.  There is no dispute that one of ordinary skill in this art can place a              
             predetermined amount of lubricant into the collection area of drum or head 15 having ports 45 of        
             the apparatus of Bergeron, as shown in Bergeron Figs. 1 and 3, “while the drum is stationary            
             disposed within the bore of a pipe having internal pipe threads” as specified in representative         
             independent claim 17.  Thus, the matter rests on whether head 15 disposed within threaded               
             section 12 of bore 11 of pipe 10, rotates with pipe 10 via a rotary table by means of swiveled          
             coupling 34, as shown in Bergeron Figs. 1, 1a and 3 (e.g., col. 3, l. 26, to col. 4, l. 2), such that   
             the lubricant is emitted through ports 45 and distributed to the internal pipe threads in a manner      
             that satisfies the claim limitation “rotating said drum at a predetermined speed effective to           
             distribute the lubricant onto the pipe threads through the plurality of holes” in the drum.             
                    Appellant submits that the apparatus of Bergeron uses a “pressure of several hundred             
             pounds per square inch . . . to force the lubricant into threaded section 12” (Bergeron, e.g., col. 2,  
             ll. 45-48, and col. 4, ll. 18-39), which is a different principal of operation than using centrifugal   
             pressure resulting from rotating the drum to effectively distribute lubricant through the holes in      
             the drum to the pipe threads as claimed (brief, page 7).  The Examiner essentially responds that        
             the rotation of drum 15 with pipe 10 would inherently result in centrifugal force in head 15            
             which would effectively distribute lubricant to the pipe threads through holes or ports 45 therein      
             (answer, page 5).  We agree with Appellant.                                                             
                    The difficulty that we have with the Examiner’s position is that the teachings in Bergeron       
             which demonstrate the claim limitation have not been identified by the Examiner.  In this               
             respect, we find that head 15 “is formed with a heavy body of non-sparking material which is            
             preferably of rubber-like composition” and shaped to provide “a close fit with thread crests of         
             threaded section 12” and to seal this section from bore 11, such that “lubricant forced outwardly       
             into threaded section 12 [through ports 45] cannot overflow and be spilled into pipe 11” (col. 3,       
             l. 53, to col. 4, l. 2; Bergeron Fig. 3). We fail to find from this disclosure that one of ordinary     
             skill in this art would have reasonably expected from the configuration of head 15 and its close        
             fit with threaded section 12 that lubricant would be effectively distributed onto the pipe threads      
             through ports 45 by reason of head 15 rotating with pipe 10 alone, and particularly since               
             Bergeron teaches that applied pressure is necessary for that purpose with the disclosed apparatus.      


                                                        - 2 -                                                        



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007