Appeal No. 2006-2421 Application 10/346,773 Accordingly, the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness of the claimed method over the teachings of Bergeron within the meaning of § 103(a), and thus, we reverse both grounds of rejection, there being no teaching in Stash which would establish otherwise. The examiner’s decision is reversed. Reversed BRADLEY R. GARRIS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) CHUNG K. PAK ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) CHARLES F. WARREN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 3 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007