Ex Parte KOIDE et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                
                         for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                       

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                            BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                             ____________                                                 
                    Ex parte AKIRA KOIDE, RYO MIYAKE, TAKAO TERAYAMA,                                     
                         HIROSHI MITSUMAKI, and TOMONARI MORIOKA                                          
                                             ____________                                                 
                                           Appeal 2006-2438                                               
                                         Application 09/259,306                                           
                                        Technology Center 1700                                            
                                             ____________                                                 
                                      Decided: September 29, 2006                                         
                                             ____________                                                 

               Before KIMLIN, KRATZ, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                              
               KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        

                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                     This appeal involves claims 4-6, 14-16, and 19.  We have jurisdiction                
               pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                               
                     Appellants’ invention is directed to a liquid feed apparatus (micro                  
               pump) that includes a liquid feed chamber defined at least in part by a                    
               deformable diaphragm.  The liquid feed chamber includes an inlet port and                  
               an outlet port, each being furnished with a valve and with the outlet port                 
               formed at a peripheral part of the feed chamber. The inlet port and outlet                 





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007