Appeal 2006-2438
Application 09/259,306
oral hearing complying with this rule, if the Board decides that a hearing is
not necessary, the Board will so notify appellant.” Given that an oral
hearing was held on May 04, 2005 prior to our Remand dated May 20, 2005
and in light of the above-noted provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 41.47, we deny
Appellants request for a second oral hearing in this case.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 4-6, 14-16, and 19 under
35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Van Lintel is reversed. The
Request for a second Oral Hearing is denied.
REVERSED/ DENIED
sld
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP
1300 NORTH SEVENTEETH STREET
SUITE 1800
ARLINGTON, VA 22209-3873
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: November 3, 2007