The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte DARIO CREMASCHI and CRISTINA PORTA __________ Appeal No. 2006-2451 Application No. 09/988,150 __________ HEARD: October 17, 2006 __________ Before ADAMS, GREEN, and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This appeal involves claims to a method for intranasal administration of a protein composition. The examiner has rejected the claims as obvious. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. We affirm. Background The nasal mucosa is an alternative route which has recently been exploited for the administration of proteins. Bomberger,1 column 1, lines 21-25. Several different approaches to accomplish nasal delivery have been used. Microspheres encapsulating proteins have been used to deliver protein drugs to the nasal passageways. Id., column 1 Bomberger et al. (Bomberger), U.S. Patent 5,879,712, issued Mar. 9, 1999 (cited by the Examiner in the rejection under § 103).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007