Appeal No. 2006-2451 Page 2 Application No. 09/988,150 4, lines 47-51. Surfactants, which increase the permeability of nasal mucous membranes, have been formulated with proteins to enhance their delivery across the nasal membranes. Specification, page 1, lines 24-28. Nasal transit retardants have also been used to facilitate protein absorption by the nasal mucosa membranes. Id., page 2, lines 10-13. All of these approaches have disadvantages. Id., page 2, lines 6- 22. The instant application describes microparticles having adsorbed protein and a specific antibody to the protein for intranasal administration. Id., page 1, lines 5-7. Discussion Claim construction Claims 11-13 and 15-19 are on appeal. Claims 20, 22, and 24-28 have been found allowable. Answer, page 2. (Claims 12 and 21 are also objected to by the Examiner. Id. This objection has not been presented for our review.) The claims stand or fall together since Appellants have not provided separate reasons for the patentability of any individual claim, but have argued the claims as a group. See 37 C.F.R. § 41.37. We have selected claim 11 as representative for the purposes of deciding this appeal. It reads as follows: 11. A method for intranasally administering a composition comprising a microparticle having a protein and an antibody adsorbed thereon, wherein said administering comprises contacting a microparticle having a protein and an antibody thereon with the nasal mucosa of a patient in need thereof, wherein said antibody is an immunoglobulin specific for the protein.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007