Ex Parte Boutaghou et al - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                     
                 publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                             

                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                _______________                                                     
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                _______________                                                     
                        Ex parte ZINE-EDDINE BOUTAGHOU and JOEL DAVID LIMMER                                        
                                                _______________                                                     
                                              Appeal No. 2006-2457                                                  
                                            Application No. 10/358,831                                              
                                                _______________                                                     
                                                    ON BRIEF                                                        
                                                _______________                                                     

                 Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                             
                 JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                          


                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                      
                       This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                              
                 examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4, 8, 10, 20-24, and 30-35.  Claims 11-17 and                     
                 25-29 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to non-elected                      
                 species [answer, page 2].                                                                          
                      The disclosed invention pertains to an actuation mechanism used in a                         
                 data storage system.  The actuation mechanism includes a spring member with a                      
                 first end coupled to an anchor.  A suspension is coupled to a second end of the                    
                 spring member that supports a data head above a media surface.  In one                             







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007