Appeal No. 2006-2458
Application No. 10/147,673
[answer, pages 3 and 4].
_ Claims 1-3, 7-17, 19 and 23-25 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Horiguchi in view of Robinson [answer, pages 4-7].
3. Claims 4-6, 18 and 20-22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Horiguchi in view of
Robinson, and further in view of Zhilyaev [answer, pages 7-10].
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the examiner, we make
reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details thereof.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007