The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte RUSSELL B. NABER,
JEFFREY J. KESTER,
JOHNSON W. MCRORIE, JR.,
STCEY L. ADAMS and
RICHARD G. SCHAFERMEYER
__________
Appeal 2006-2468
Application 10/149,875
Technology Center 1700
___________
Decided: September 28, 2006
___________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ, TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
PER CURIAM.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal was taken pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1-6, 8-22, 25-40, 42-53, 60, and 62-69.1 Claims 7, 23,
1The Examiner in the Answer and Appellants in the Briefs variously refer to
claims 54-59 as being among the appealed and/or rejected claims. However,
this is not the case as claims 54-59 are cancelled. See page 11 of the entered
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007