The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte ALEXANDER MAASS _______________ Appeal No. 2006-2480 Application No. 10/384,862 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent Judges. JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING Appellant requests that we reconsider our decision of Sept. 27, 2006, in which we sustained the rejection of claims 1 and 3-10 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We have reconsidered our decision of Sept. 27, 2006, in light of appellant’s comments in the request for rehearing, and we find no errors therein. We, therefore, decline to change our prior decision for the following reasons.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007