The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAJ D. PATEL, MICHAEL A. HOPPER,
VLADISLAV SKOROKHOD, RICHARD P.N. VEREGIN,
MICHAEL S. HAWKINS and PAUL J. GERROIR
____________
Appeal 2006-2507
Application 10/106,473
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: November 9, 2006
____________
Before GARRIS, TIMM, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal involves claims 23 and 39, the only claims pending in this
application. Claims 1-22, 24-38 and 40 have been cancelled. We have
jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007