Ex Parte Gales et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-2509                                                                                       
              Application No. 10/001,431                                                                                 

                                                    BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention relates to a method of defining security conditions of a computer                     
              system.  Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                       
                     1. A method of defining the security condition of a computer system,                                
                     comprising:                                                                                         
                            generating a human-readable and machine-readable vulnerability                               
                     description language (VDL) file specifying:                                                         
                                   an identity of an attack;                                                             
                                   at least one attribute of the specified attack;                                       
                                   at least one policy definition with respect to the specified attack;                  
                            and                                                                                          
                                   at least one attribute of the specified policy definition.                            
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                    
              Vaidya    US 6,279,113 B1   Aug. 21, 2001                                                                  
                                                                              (filed Jun.   4, 1998)                     
              Chefalas et al. (Chefalas)  US 2002/0116639 A1  Aug. 22, 2002                                              
                                                                              (filed Feb. 21, 2001)                      
                     Claims 1 and 3-29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by                      
              Chefalas.                                                                                                  
                     Claim 2 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                            
              Chefalas and Vaidya.                                                                                       
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (mailed Aug. 31, 2005) and the Examiner’s                           



                                                           -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007