The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte PANAYOTIS C. ANDRICACOS,
ROY A. CARRUTHERS, STEPHAN A. COHEN,
JOHN M. COTTE, LYNNE M. GIGNAC,
KENNETH J. STEIN, KEITH T. KWIETNIAK,
SESHADRI SUBBANNA,
HORATIO S. WILDMAN, DAVID E. SEEGER,
and ANDREW H. SIMON
____________
Appeal 2006-2603
Application 10/270,486
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 31, 2006
____________
Before KIMLIN, TIMM, and GAUDETTE, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-19, 31, 32, and
60-67. Claim 65 is illustrative:
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007