Ex Parte Hiedlas et al - Page 2



                 Appeal 2006-2610                                                                                   
                 Application 10/362,136                                                                             

                       compressed gas at a gas density of at least 0.15 to 1.3 kg/l under at                        
                       least two unsymmetrical pulsations in such a manner that, per                                
                       individual pulsation of a duration of at least 5 s and no more than                          
                       60 min, the respective time period to achieve the pressure maximum is                        
                       greater than the time period for pressure reduction to the minimum.                          
                       The Examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of                             
                 obviousness:                                                                                       
                 Shine  US 5,766,637 Jun. 16, 1998                                                                  
                 Redding US 5,271,881 Dec. 21, 1993                                                                 
                 Murthy US 4,737,384 Apr. 12, 1988                                                                  
                       Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a method for                                    
                 impregnating a carrier matrix with a solid or liquid compound using                                
                 compressed gas.  The compressed gas is applied under at least two                                  
                 unsymmetrical pulsations, i.e., the pressure is increased and then abruptly                        
                 released at least twice.  Each individual pulsation is of a duration of at least                   
                 5 seconds and no more than 60 minutes.                                                             
                       Appealed claims 19-52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                             
                 being unpatentable over Shine in view of either Redding or Murthy.                                 
                       Appellants have not presented arguments for any particular claim on                          
                 appeal.  Accordingly, all the appealed claims stand or fall together with                          
                 claim 19.                                                                                          
                       We have carefully reviewed each of Appellants' arguments for                                 
                 patentability.  However, we are in complete agreement with the Examiner                            
                 that the claimed subject matter would have been obvious to one of ordinary                         
                 skill in the art within the meaning of § 103 in view of the applied prior art.                     
                                                        -2-                                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007