Ex Parte Monson - Page 2

                 Appeal 2006-2612                                                                                   
                 Application 10/225,316                                                                             
                       Appellant’s claimed invention is directed to a shock isolator including                      
                 elastomeric sidewalls forming a cavity, a base member secured to a first end                       
                 of the sidewalls (first base end), and a pressure equalizer.  Appellant                            
                 discloses that the shock isolator functions as a support for a load while                          
                 providing vibration and shock attenuation benefits.  See, for example, page                        
                 4, lines 20-24 of Appellant’s Specification.  Claim 1 is reproduced below.                         
                              A shock isolator for simultaneously isolating shocks and for                          
                       supporting a static load comprising:                                                         
                              a set of elastomer side walls forming a cavity therein, said side                     
                       walls having a central axis, a first base end, and a second base end,                        
                       said first base end and said second base end centrally positioned with                       
                       respect to each other so that line parallel to said central axis and                         
                       extending through said first base end does not extend through said                           
                       second base end and vice versa;                                                              
                              a first base member, said first base member secured to said first                     
                       base end of said side walls to thereby encapsulate the cavity within the                     
                       side walls; and                                                                              
                              a pressure equalizer, said pressure equalizer venting a fluid                         
                       from the cavity within the side walls as the shock isolator is                               
                       compressed and allowing the fluid to enter the cavity within the side                        
                       walls as the shock isolator returns to an uncompressed state to thereby                      
                       prevent a fluid pressure differential across the side walls from                             
                       inhibiting an elastomeric response of the shock isolator.                                    
                                                                                                                   
                       The Examiner relies on the following prior art reference as evidence                         
                 that is used in rejecting the appealed claims:                                                     
                       Landi        US 5,180,619          Jan. 19, 1993                                             



                                                         2                                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007