Ex Parte Nishibe et al - Page 4



              Appeal No. 2006-2630                                                      Page 4                       
              Application No. 10/255,014                                                                                
              Answer, p. 3.  The examiner stated that “appellant does not present any facts to                          
              convince the Examiner that the temporary heat seal in appellant’s claim is anything                       
              more than an intermediate process step within a product claim.”  Answer, p. 5.                            
                     The appellants argue that Wild does not disclose a pouch with a seal material                      
              covering the straw hole that has a circumference that is slightly larger than the                         
              circumference of the straw hole.  We note that claim 1 does not require that the                          
              circumference of the seal material is slightly larger than the circumference of the                       
              straw hole.  Rather, claim 1 recites, “the predetermined circumference of said seal                       
              material is slightly larger than the temporary heat seal width around the straw                           
              hole.”  The examiner found that this limitation was met by the disclosure of Wild,                        
              because the circumference of the Wild seal material (11) is slightly larger than the                      
              heat seal width.  The examiner noted that the circumference of the seal material is                       
              equal to 2πr, where r equals the radius of the seal material, and the radius of the                       
              seal material in Wild is slightly larger than the heat seal width.  Answer, p. 3.                         
                     We agree with the examiner.  Wild discloses, with reference to Figure 4, a                         
              sealing foil patch (11) that is sealed around a straw hole (2) to the sealing points                      
              (8) at the inner side of the pouch material (3).  Wild, col. 3, lines 28-31.  The radius                  
              of the patch (11) of Wild is slightly larger than the width of the seal (8) of Wild,                      
              because the width of the seal (8) excludes the center area of the patch (11) that                         
              covers the straw hole, as shown in cross-section in Figure 2 of Wild.  As such, the                       
              circumference of the patch (11) must necessarily be larger than the width of the                          
              seal (8).                                                                                                 
                     The appellants also argue that Wild does not disclose that the straw hole                          
              patch is first temporarily sealed to the pouch using a temporary seal having a                            
              temporary seal width and then permanently sealed to the pouch using a permanent                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007