Ex Parte Amling et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2006-2638                                                                                      
              Application No. 10/095,616                                                                                

                                                   BACKGROUND                                                           
                     The invention relates to endoscopic video camera systems, where the video                          
              camera electronically identifies an attached endoscope and automatically sets system                      
              parameters in accordance with certain endoscope parameters.  Representative claim 26                      
              is reproduced below.                                                                                      
                     26. An endoscopic video system for communicating between an endoscope                              
                     and a detachable camera head comprising:                                                           
                            a first transponder/transceiver affixed to the endoscope for transmitting                   
                     and receiving first data;                                                                          
                            a second transponder/transceiver affixed to the detachable camera head                      
                     for transmitting and receiving second data; and                                                    
                            a memory device coupled to the first transponder/transceiver having                         
                     memory locations for storing data.                                                                 
                     The examiner relies on the following references:                                                   
              Upton et al. (Upton)      US 6,141,037   Oct. 31, 2000                                                    
              Kura et al. (Kura)       EP 1 155 654 A1  Nov. 21, 2001                                                   
                     Claims 26-28, 30, 31, and 38 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 as being                         
              anticipated by Upton.                                                                                     
                     Claims 1-11, 13-25, 29, and 32-37 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 as being                    
              unpatentable over Upton and Kura.                                                                         
                     Claim 12 stands objected to as containing patentable subject matter.                               
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (mailed Aug. 10, 2005) and the Examiner=s                          
              Answer (mailed May 17, 2006) for a statement of the examiner=s position and to the                        
                                                          -2-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007