Ex Parte Amling et al - Page 8




              Appeal No. 2006-2638                                                                                      
              Application No. 10/095,616                                                                                

              sustain the rejection of claim 13, and of claims 14 through 17 not separately argued by                   
              appellants.                                                                                               


                                                    CONCLUSION                                                          
                     The rejection of claims 26-28, 30, 31, and 38 under 35 U.S.C. ' 102 as being                       
              anticipated by Upton is reversed.  The rejection of claims 1-11, 13-25, 29, and 32-37                     
              under 35 U.S.C. ' 103 as being unpatentable over Upton and Kura is affirmed with                          
              respect to claims 13-23 but reversed with respect to claims 1-11, 24, 25, 29, and 32-37.                  
              The examiner=s decision is thus affirmed-in-part.                                                         





















                                                          -8-                                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007