The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TAKASHI MIYAMOTO and ARITO ASAI
__________
Appeal No. 2006-2742
Application No. 10/115,138
___________
ON BRIEF1
___________
Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. ' 134(a) from
the Examiner=s final rejection of claims 1-10. The Examiner=s
designation of claims 2 and 3 as objected to for being dependent
upon a rejected base claim, but otherwise allowable if rewritten
1 An October 17, 2006 oral hearing was deemed moot in view of the
decision of this panel not to sustain the rejections under appeal.
Appellants= representative was informed via a telephonic communication on
October 12, 2006.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007