Ex Parte Campbell et al - Page 2


             Appeal No. 2006-2817                                                           Page 2               
             Application No. 10/734,979                                                                          

             durable urethane bonds, they are resistant to degradation and other environmental                   
             factors.  Id.  Typically, the compositions are applied to substrates, such as automobile            
             parts, by spraying.  Id., ¶ 23.  Waste from the process, including unreacted                        
             triisocyanates, is discharged into the sewage system which “then finds its way into                 
             natural waterways.”  Id., ¶ 3.                                                                      
                   According to the specification, the commercially available triisocyanate is not               
             used industrially because it is toxic to aquatic life and cannot be safely released into the        
             sewage system.  Id., ¶ 3.  For this reason, its use has been restricted by the U.S.                 
             Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and has not been used in the automobile                       
             industry in the United States.  Id.  The application described describes melamine                   
             triisocyanates which “have both an increased removal rate by sewage treatment and a                 
             reduced aquatic toxicity,” and thus can be expelled into sewers without the risk of                 
             harming aquatic life.  Id., ¶ 5.                                                                    


                                                   Discussion                                                    
             Claim construction                                                                                  
                   Claims 1-14 are on appeal.  Claim 4 has been separately argued, and thus does                 
             not stand or fall together with claims 1-3 and 5-14.  We select claim 1 as representative.          
             Claims 1 and 4 read as follows:                                                                     












Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007