The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte WILLIAM P. BELIAS, DAVID A. BRYNIARSKI, PAUL N. CHEN,
SUSAN P. EVANS, STEVEN P. LONG, CLIFFORD H. PATRIDGE, and
JASON M. STANCHOCK
___________
Appeal No. 2006-2894
Application No. 10/375,188
Technology Center 3700
___________
HEARD: November 14, 2006
___________
Before FRANKFORT, OWENS and HORNER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from a rejection of claims 1-9, 14-17, 19-25
and 27-29. Claims 10-13, 18 and 26, which are all of the other
pending claims, stand withdrawn from consideration by the
examiner as claiming a nonelected invention.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007