Appeal No. 2006-2963
Application No. 10/309,969
that the skilled artisan would have reasonably relied on de Boor’s teachings essentially
for the reasons stated by the Examiner in the rejection. The Examiner’s obviousness
rejection of claims 2-7, 12-17, and 22-27 is therefore sustained.
In summary, we have sustained the Examiner's rejection with respect to all
claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1-30 is
affirmed.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007