Ex Parte Morris et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2006-3034                                           Page 3           
          Application No. 09/855,115                                                      

             • a buffer coupled to receive encoded field data from the encoding stage     
               and arranged to subsequently output the stored data at a bit rate          

               determined at least partially by the fullness of the buffer;               

             • wherein the encoding stage is further arranged to encode each image        
               field as a series of slices each comprised of a predetermined number of    

               successive lines of the field and within a predetermined number of         

               data bits allocated for the encoding of a slice, and the buffer is         

               arranged such that the encoded data for the slice is read in thereto       

               and subsequently read out therefrom on completion of encoding of the       

               slice.                                                                     

                                    THE REFERENCES                                        

               The examiner relies on the following references:                           

          Dieterich                 6,233,278                May 15, 2001               
                                                         (filed Jul. 31, 2000)            

          Kato et al.  (Kato)        6,535,556                Mar. 18, 2003              
                                        (division filed Dec. 10, 1997)                    

                                    THE REJECTIONS                                        

               The following rejections are on appeal before us:                          

               1. Claims 1-4 and 6-10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as          
                  being anticipated by Dieterich.                                         

               2. Claims 5 and 11-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as           
                  being unpatentable over the teachings of Dieterich in view of Kato.     







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007