Ex Parte Winkler et al - Page 1




                        The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not                     
                         written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    
                                                                                                              


                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   

                                                __________                                                     

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                __________                                                     

                     Ex parte JOERG WINKLER, FRANK BARTH, and LARRY HEWITT                                     
                                                __________                                                     

                                           Appeal No. 2006-3044                                                
                                        Application No. 10/285,939                                             
                                                __________                                                     

                                                  ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                     

             Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent                                   
             Judges.                                                                                           

             JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                    

             This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the                                   

             examiner’s rejection of claims 1-38.                                                              



                                             THE INVENTION                                                     

                   The disclosed invention pertains to a response reordering mechanism.                        

                   Representative claim 1 is illustrative:                                                     







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007