Appeal No. 2006-3044 Page 3
Application No. 10/285,939
• HyperTransport Technology Consortium, “HyperTransport I/O Link
Specification”, Revision 1.03 (Oct. 10, 2001), 17-18, 38-40, 61-62 and
165-166. (“HTTC”).
THE REJECTIONS
The following rejections are on appeal before us:
1. Claims 1, 2, 5-7, 9-22, 25-27 and 29-38 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of
AAPA in view of Harriman.
2. Claims 3, 4, 8, 23, 24 and 28 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over the teachings of
AAPA in view of Harriman, and further in view of HTTC.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the examiner, we
make reference to the briefs and the answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the
rejections advanced by the examiner and the evidence of obviousness relied
upon by the examiner as support for the rejections. We have, likewise,
reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision, the
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007