Ex Parte Burleson et al - Page 1



                   ;he opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not               
                    written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.              
                                                                                                   

                    UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                            __________                                              
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                              
                                            __________                                              
                   Ex parte WINSLOW SCOTT BURLESON, DAVID JUN LU, and                               
                                    JOHN MARTIN MULLALY                                             
                                            __________                                              
                                       Appeal No. 2006-3093                                         
                                     Application No. 10/754,306                                     
                                            __________                                              
                                            ON BRIEF                                                
                                            __________                                              
           Before JERRY SMITH, BARRY, and HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.                     
           JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                


                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                             
           This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s               
           rejection of claims 1-4, 7, 16-19 and 66-69. Claims 5, 6, 8-15, and 20-65 have been      
           cancelled.                                                                               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007