Appeal No. 2006-3138
Application No. 09/683,351
Similarly, we cannot sustain the rejection of independent claims 8, 9, and 10 since
we cannot find that the Examiner has established a sufficiently clear case of obviousness
of the invention recited in these claims.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, we have reversed the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5 and 7-10
under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007